Friday, June 21, 2019

Some Random Commentary on Neven , Quantum Computation and the @KSHartnett @Quanta article

                           


     06/20/2019     11:50 pm EST


    So anyway that last post dated 03/05/2019
should give you some idea of just how really huge my home planet is . Atmospheric turbulence is so strong it can literally pitch you repeatedly back into orbit multiple times until you hit it just right and...
    In truth the work I'm doing is a big deal to me and has been threatening to achieve self propelled flight for some time. In spite of multiple disasters over the last several years we've managed to keep those irons in the fire. I've pared expenses down to the bone and this also being now a 3rd Florida summer without air conditioning plus year 2 of bicycle-as-sole means of transportation...I think I can use the word survivor without qualification. Still , I have to shut down here for 20 minutes or so when the temp climbs over 100⁰ which unfortunately becomes a fact of life as we head into August. 
    Reasons for return and amplification of efforts via blogging , social and site building have been mounting across multiple dimensions and now we have this :








There will be the usually presumptive breathless leaps as press conflate computational unbounding with physical unbounding which of course has not (and will not) happen but then there is this :




He goes on to say : “They’re the ones who need to articulate where and why the progress will stop.”
The thing in the article that made me get up and walk around a bit :

_______________________________________________________________                                          
Quanta author @KSHartnett : 

That rapid improvement has led to what’s being called “Neven’s law,” a new kind of rule to describe how quickly quantum computers are gaining on classical ones. The rule began as an in-house observation before Neven mentioned it in May at the Google Quantum Spring Symposium. There, he said that quantum computers are gaining computational power relative to classical ones at a “doubly exponential” rate — a staggeringly fast clip.

With double exponential growth, “it looks like nothing is happening, nothing is happening, and then whoops, suddenly you’re in a different world,” Neven said. “That’s what we’re experiencing here.”
________________________________________________________________


That observation itself is not wholly unexpected - it's the observation of the transition-as-phase-change that stops you in your tracks...and that must have blown team Google's socks clean off. 

Now elevating these observations to something akin to Moore's law will take a bit more than what's in the article:






...a bit of wise-assery but folks on reddit and elsewhere were already making way for tachyonic computation with unbounded double exponentials !

 My current research is at the intersection of classical and quantum computation ;overlaps and duals in the computational hierarchy that may or may not have consequences regarding spectra of macroscopic phenomena (Augmented 𝜳) and some seemingly outrageous but now fully acknowledged links to cosmology and the standard model (AdS/CFT , quantum error correcting codes, gravitational waves, black holes). How does one make practical applications of these disparate areas ? It depends on what kind of questions your asking. Part of this frontier involves machine learning and artificial intelligence. Those two represent the crossroads , a full bore playground where both fun and terror reside in equal measure. The application that links them all together is called signal detection.


      ...More To Come

































Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Re entry Sequence Initiated



 03/05/2019   11:28 PM



 Holy Toledo, it's been awhile so we'll not waste any time playing catch up. While the workings of a new site get underway I'll be resuming blogging here until that's up and running. Project goals have not changed much in terms of integrating news, research work, music and band.The one fundamental change is on fading out the lazy & haphazard writing habits engendered via posting bits on social media instead of engaging in the craft of writing and producing work that has a clear focus. Twitter habits have become deadly in that regard and I know legions of otherwise skilled writers have been sucked down the same hole.

        The decision to employ media in a way more designated for marketing one's work professionally forces some choices that require pause. Do you stick with social accounts that have been catch basins for all manner of goofing off as well as your serious side or do you start fresh ? Clearly the clean slate is easier to work with but some of us also like having that old stuff around for someone to dredge up and embarrass us with. I'll probably go with some combination of the two. I've spent way too much time playing with twitter as a way to shout across networks and have run several experiments playing with handle-less threads that could be tracked across multiple networks while remaining semi private. This means Killeans Row twitter has accumulated several thousand tweets without handles from conversations that would have never happened using a tool like direct messaging. Needless to say this kind of data isn't of much use to the rank & file twitter user. I'd like to have found a way of demonstrating hooks that would make this work for everyone without violating terms of service but it's just not possible in the current environment.


     Just one more thing: I'm not sure there is anyone left on Planet Earth that can say they don't have a dog in the race of current events, politics and science. We are simultaneously in a brave new world of possibilities with regards to science delimiting our resources while simultaneously entering more deeply into the next great ecological extinction event. It would appear we still have time to change the ending. There is hope.